Post by UttuqXul on Jun 24, 2018 23:27:16 GMT -5
I've been looking at some old photographs, from the Victorian and Edwardian eras, of women chiefly, and have noticed that really they generally look much better than the men- I mean, on the average... Apparently what is true this aeon was true then also, that the average quality of the women was higher than that of the men. I've considered the theory that the reason for this is that the women had more time for things like refining development, self-culture, cultivation, contemplation- which can be so healthful and good- than the hard working, enterprising and materially pressured (as in vocations) men. However, I'll now offer that this theory is incorrect.
The Truth of the matter is this: Apparently this Earth and this area in the Solar System, Galaxy, Universe provides naturally more in the way of benign, helpful energies for women than it does for men- and has throughout all of human history! It's also not true that the fact that the Moon is, relative to the Earth much bigger than is the norm for planets, for some reason pertaining to certain very early solar system events, causes this.
This doesn't change a few facts about allotment of males, such as for a true esoteric School, Lodge, Church or Order there needs to be a certain sort of priest, or initiate at the head, who must be physically male. In the Christian church of course the term Pope has been used for this sort of High Initiate. By the Templars hermetic scale, I count seven higher offices of the priesthood (as some would call them) which a physically female actually can't hold, beginning with Magister Templi. This is just for orders, organizations, which function in coordination together.
The lineage of Toltec shamanic gurus, which topic has enjoyed popular interest beginning some time ago-will say things like "Women are tops" or "Women are better suited for the Path Of Knowledge than men." The High Initiate shaman Leader of a small group has said things like this...